Connect with us

Alternative News

The Social Engineering Of The Meaning Of Life

Published

on

The Social Engineering Of The Meaning Of Life
Photo Credit: Getty

We have been fed lies by a system designed to enslave us since birth. It uses deception as its primary means to accomplish this, and it involves institutions that we have been told to trust unconditionally. It is multi-faceted, multi-layered, and its primary means of perpetuating itself is through purposefully designed indoctrination through education. Logic and critical thinking are, by design, removed from the equation. This guarantees that we will only learn what they want us to learn, and think how they want us to think.

In detail, this system can be best described by the adage “garbage in, garbage out”. When the foundation from which a society derives itself is built upon lies, it is an absolute guarantee that the lies will permeate every aspect of that society. Over time, those lies begin to appear as unquestionable truths, and are committed as such in the knowledge base that subsequent generations are taught from.

The institution of Science is an excellent example of this. What we are told is a scientific fact had actually begun its life as a scientific theory, but over time and repetition those theories had come to be considered indisputable truths. For example, Darwin’s theory of evolution, though impossible to prove in the absence of any observable evidence by way of transitional fossil records, and impossible to validate by human observation, is nonetheless accepted as truth in academia and taught as such at the expense of other possibilities. This tends to narrow our perspective, and prevents any meaningful debate on the subject.

Let us consider certain elements from the concept of “survival of the fittest”.

Collectively, a society that works against its own best interests would eventually annihilate itself. Survival of any kind need not apply in that regard. Yet we are not taught to conduct ourselves for the benefit of the greater good. Instead our narratives as a society favour service-to-self rather than service-to-other. In such a society, feeding the homeless becomes illegal while allowing them to die of starvation becomes common acceptable policy.

This approach to life does not resonate with the concept of survival, or evolution, in any way. Let us imagine humanity being dwindled down to only two persons of the opposite gender. From the perspective of service-to-self, procreation would be guaranteed; however, if food were a limited resource and humans were devoid of compassion, the offspring would die as acts of love and compassion are required to feed and nurture a baby. If limited resources were not shared for the greater good among the two remaining adults, one would perish and the other, no matter how much abundance they may have, would ultimately die along with the entire species.

Other forms of social engineering are based around the exploitation of basic human psychology. Humans tend to believe that others share an identical moral compass that they themselves possess. For example, those who are inclined to trust others expect this trust to be reciprocated and are typically at odds when it is not. It has been said that it is far easier to lie to people than it is to convince them that they have been lied to, and this is most evident in the social dynamics of politics.

Image source: Collective Evolution

Another tool of psychological manipulation is when a series of contradictory concepts or beliefs are introduced into the human mind simultaneously. This results in a condition known as cognitive dissonance, characterized as psychological stress. When tactically combined, these manipulations, often times coupled with an element of fear, collectively become the currency of mind control.

It is also worthwhile to consider the psychological aspects of authority. Since childhood we are conditioned to accept the authority of our parents, teachers, professors, priests, police officers, politicians, doctors, reporters, television news anchors, and so on. Because of this, we typically lend our trust to other professionals without question. Without discernment, we open the door to allowing persons of authority to make decisions for us. For good or for ill, we wilfully submit and assume that, because of their position, they automatically know what is in our best interest. Many fail to consider that professionals may be motivated by other factors, the least of which could very well be our wellbeing.

So, Why Are We Here? What Is The Purpose?

The meaning of life is subjective, and certainly we have the freewill to decide that for ourselves; however, there is a considerable amount of manipulation with regards to certain aspects of society that tend to dictate that purpose to us for which we are engineered and conditioned to unwittingly select. Certain figures across many disciplines from mainstream entertainment industries (actors, musicians, and politicians) are given a platform to preach and promote specific common themes to us. One of these themes is the accumulation and promotion of wealth as an indication of some form of status or, to some extremes, the suggestion of accumulating wealth as being the entire meaning of life.

By philosophical standards this is a facade. For each of us, the human experience eventually draws to an end. When that happens all of our efforts to accumulate wealth at the expense of living life to the fullest are for naught. We cannot take a single penny of that wealth with us when we leave this plane of existence. So certainly that can’t be all that life is worth.

Yet in western societies we are bombarded from every direction with the suggestion that this is the meaning of life. This, coupled with social engineering dictated by the “powers that be”, give you no choice but to earn a living in which those earnings will be siphoned off unfairly through taxes and by interest payments made on loans.

This is not an argument against sound money or a fair monetary system. Not at all. The system of finance created and controlled by the international bankers is not sound money and is not a fair monetary system. It was not designed that way and it was never intended to be used as such.

Consider the illegal Federal Reserve system scam which prints paper money, or fiat, with zero intrinsic value. It costs the banks approximately 4 cents to print a bill with any face value ($1, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100, etc). The bank receives the full value of that bill plus interest as additional profit when loaning that amount out, yet it only cost them pennies to create that value.

Those in control of the international banking cartel can print all the money that they want. You, however, have to work to achieve the earning of that value that is printed, and then a percentage of what you earn is regularly taken from you illegally.

Considering this, it is appalling that there are people living in poverty at all, at anytime, anywhere. This is not the hallmark of a successfully engineered collectively beneficial system for the promotion of the greater good. And it has nothing to do with philosophical, social, political, and/or economic ideologies. It has everything to do with using finance as a means of control and enslavement.

Notice how this and other related financial truths, such as the history of money, are never taught in any of our schools.

It goes without saying that in order for you to willingly participate in a scam where natural resources are controlled by those who use finance to dangle a carrot on a stick in front of you purportedly for your own survival (only food and water are needed to survive), you would need to be indoctrinated into supporting such manipulations designed to keep you as a hamster on a wheel until you draw your last breath. Other tactics are engineered specifically for that reason such as usury as debt is truly a form of institutionalized financial enslavement.

This is but one example of how social engineering through indoctrination can guarantee the perpetuation of a system that was never designed for the benefit of humanity but for the benefit of a select few at the expense of many. Clearly, we would have to be manipulated and indoctrinated to support such a system that is designed to work against our own best interests and against the best interests of the collective.

If you enjoyed reading this article and want to see more like this one, we’d be humbled if you would help us spread the word and share it with your friends and family. Join us in our quest to promote free, useful information to all!

About the Author

Patrick Herbert is a software engineer, researcher, and writer who currently resides in Texas. He has been through some remarkable metaphysical experiences that led to a spiritual awakening and is actively pursuing ways to help to raise the awareness of others with regards to the elements of what we call the global conspiracy and how it affects all of our lives regardless of political disposition.

Visit his website at https://patrickherbert.org/

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Artificial Intelligence – The Biggest Hope Or The Greatest Threat To Humanity?

Published

on

Photo Credit: Pexels

Mike Sygula, Guest Writer

In 1997, Deep Blue — the computer created by IBM — defeated World Chess Champion, Garry Kasparov. Some say that it was one of the first major examples of AI in action, others believe that the technology used was still quite simple and shouldn’t even be called AI.

20 years later, things are slowly starting to take shape. Last year, we heard about Google’s DeepMind beating the world champion of Go — an ancient board game known for its seemingly innumerable possibilities. While Deep Blue was originally designed specifically to play chess, DeepMind’s system has been designed to teach itself how to play the Go game (by playing with itself), and not simply carry out fixed, previously programmed moves. Deepmind’s system is general purpose and can be used for many tasks. It already has been tested with mastering many video games, for example.

For many researchers in the field of Artificial Intelligence, it was a major breakthrough, proving its potential. At this point many scientists believed that such breakthrough was still at least a decade away.

AI – The New Electricity?

AI technologies are already here. When you browse Facebook or use Google to search for anything, AI algorithms try to bring you the most relevant content. More and more brands and organisations use AI chatbots to communicate with their customers. In the UK, for example,the National Health Service, offers an app that can be used by patients to diagnose their symptoms. It can recommend over-the-counter remedies and similar conventional practices. The upcoming version, will be able to diagnose over 80% of all illnesses that are generally diagnosed by primary care doctors.

Virtual personal assistants are another example of how AI is currently being used. Apple’s SiriGoogle Assistant or Amazon Echo, are just a few examples. They can answer questions, book appointments, make phone calls, send messages, play music, or set up reminders. We see examples of smart devices and the expansion of the Internet of things, this area will be improving dramatically over the next few years. Recently, Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg, revealed how he programs his AI smart home system called Jarvis:

It can be used for things like turning on and off the lights, or it can tell you who is waiting at the door. Companies, like Google, are working on self driving cars that use AI technologies. Soon, taxis and cars will all be autonomous according to people like Elon Musk — CEO of Tesla Motors.

Autonomous cars have a lot of potential; they can find parking lots, potentially eliminate collisions, and even earn their owners money if rented out. In the next few years, everything will be connected to the internet; our devices, tools, homes, transportation, restaurants, stores, and whole cities — even plants — and perhaps we will also start merging our bodies with AI technologies.

How Far Is The Future?

Some people think that we are still far away from some of these larger developments, like self driving cars or general AI, that can help us solve big problems or merging our bodies with AI. But it actually might be closer than we think. One important rule when thinking about technological developments is that these systems grow exponentially and not linearly.

What this means is that if you have, for example, linear growth and you take 30 steps, you just end up with 30 steps. But, if you have exponential growth, you take 30 steps and you get to 1bln. So, for example, 1+1 = 2, 2+2 = 4, 4+4 = 8, 8+8 = 16, 16+16 = 32 and etc. With just 30 steps, we end up with more than 1bln.

In the 1960s, a computer that cost $11 mll was so incredibly large, that it was half the size of the building at MIT. Today, our smartphones are literally a million times smaller and cheaper, and thousands of times more powerful, and this trend will continue. Everything that is currently created helps to make further improvements in the existing field, thus making things more advanced at an ever faster pace. This is why in 20 years the change will most likely be dramatic. For example, all that we use now — like smartphones, email tools, internet, cars for transporting goods, cloud systems or other ready systems — all allow us to create technologies that are faster, more advanced and at lower cost.

Experts predict that by 2025, 30% of jobs will be replaced by robots and AI systems. Just recently, it was announced that Elon Musk — the visionary behind Tesla Motors and SpaceX — is backing a brain-computer interface startup called Neuralink, that will allow for AI systems and devices to merge with human brains. The purpose will be to improve memory, or allow for more direct use of computing devices. It is claimed that the company is in the early stages, but it is known that several other companies are also working on different technologies that could turn us into cyborgs. Ray Kurzweil, known inventor and futurist, predicts that by 2030 our minds will be able to connect to the cloud thanks to tiny nanobots made of DNA. It is worth noting that researchers already used DNA nanobots to target and destroy cancer cells.

What AI Means For The Future Of Humanity?

Personally, I believe that Artificial Intelligence will have the most profound impact on humanity in the 21st century. Like many other inventions, it can be used to create good or evil. The internet, for example, provides tremendous opportunities. We can communicate with friends and family instantly, we can access knowledge about anything in a matter of seconds, we can build technology software to assist with our businesses and tasks, but at the same time it can be used to spy on people by governments, it can be used for things like pornography, creating propaganda, etc. It can make us less connected with others in real life, as we are hooked to our devices. With AI, things jump to another level. The implications are enormous and hard to predict. AI can be programmed to self improve — Theoretically, there are no limits to what it could do and how advanced it could become.

Here are few potential scenarios:
1. General AI

General AI can be used to solve problems and answer big questions. Theoretically, it could learn anything from the internet and it could be designed to help us to find solutions to issues like intergalactic space travel or it could help to solve some scientific problems, like the relationship between relativity and quantum physics.

2. AI and Longevity

AI can help us to increase our life expectancy, battle illnesses and maybe even make us immortal. Known inventor and futurist Ray Kurzweil, whose predictions have displayed an 86% accuracy rate thus far, believes that “By the 2020s we’ll start using nanobots to complete the job of the immune system,” We might be using nanobots to target diseases, or we might just use them to monitor our health. They could send us updates to our devices, so we can fight disease at very early stages. AI powered robots will perform surgeries making operations safer and more precise.

3. Merging With AI Systems

One of the more controversial areas is enhancing our biology by installing electronic implants. Think about searching for something on the internet by simply thinking about it, instead of typing it on an external keyboard or giving voice commands. We already have engineers testing drones that can be controlled with your thoughts using EEG brain-computer interface:

The future might require us to install implants into our bodies, this is a controversial area, but in the same way as many women desire breast implants, many will see electronic brain implants as something desirable. And now think on how much advantage an employee who can instantly get data from the internet has over people who don’t use such technology? Your future employer can decide to hire someone with an implant instead of someone without it, which could force other people to start having them as they would fall behind.

4. Bid Data and AI System Optimisation

AI can help to optimise and improve the efficiency of any system. It can be used to foresee trends, find patterns and predict outcomes. For example, if you run a company that consists of human resources, financial resources, and physical and non physical assets; customers and other variables, an AI system could analyse all these different elements and be programmed to optimise performance for the entire company, find the best solutions or eliminate friction, and do whatever is required. In the future, AI will be able to run multiple operations for the company simultaneously.

5. AI and The Future Of The Workplace

Many jobs will become obsolete. Over the next few years we will see increased demand for engineers and programmers, and declining demand for many other jobs. AI systems and robots will slowly take over human tasks. Autonomous cars will eliminate the need for drivers. AI software will be able to diagnose health problems. Amazon, for example, recently unveiled its grocery store that has no checkouts. You just tap your phone when you get inside, you pick what you like and put it in your bag. It charges you for the items you’ve picked when you leave the store. Chatbots will slowly replace customer service agents. The justice system will be dramatically transformed. Apps like DoNotPay help with legal advice. It has already helped to overturn at least 200,000 parking tickets so far. Users can provide details surrounding the violation, and the app can then just create a letter that can be used to contest the ticket. These are only a few examples, but there are very few jobs that won’t be affected by this shift.

6. The Dark Side Of AI

In recent years some of the greatest minds alive — like Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk and Bill Gates — have all raised concerns about AI. The world becomes more and more interconnected, and in the next 20 years, most of what we interact with, will be software driven and connected through computer networks. Autonomous cars, will become aware of other cars, and work on optimising the flow of traffic to make driving safe which will all be controlled by AI.

Imagine now that there is some kind of bug or an error and suddenly all cars crash or break? Maybe someone just hacks and reprograms the system for it to crash. Maybe some group or government hacks the system, it could cause chaos. AI that, can access any system, from our homes, devices, cars to buildings and power grids, could make a big mess if used irresponsibly. In the same way that a computer virus can compromise current computer networks, it could affect AI driven Internet of things. This could have devastating implications. Financial markets could crash, every aspect of our lives could be impacted. It is certainly more dangerous than nuclear weapons.

We don’t really know how super intelligence will behave, something that is trillions of times smarter than us, could make very different decisions from us and have a different perspective on things. There is no reason to think that it will not develop strategies to secure its dominance. Imagine trying to explain to someone who lived a few thousand years ago how our world looks like today, what kind of tools we use. Can you imagine explaining things like apps and computer programs? Now think about a superior intelligence that is trillions of times smarter than people like Einstein or Tesla; the ideas that it will come up with, may be very hard for us to understand.

One thing is certain, it is coming — and whether we like it or not — we will experience some of these revolutionary changes over the next 20 years.

About the Author

Mike Sygula is a blogger, entrepreneur and activist promoting alternative ideas to raise public consciousness of the important issues facing humankind. He is the founder of Truth Theory.

This article (Artificial Intelligence – The Biggest Hope Or The Greatest Threat To Humanity?) was originally featured at Truth Theory and is re-posted here with permission.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

California Mayor Admits Local Government Has “Lost Control” Of 5G Rollout

Published

on

Photo Credit: The MİND Unleashed

Derrick Broze, TMU

On March 6, the Danville Town Council voted four to one to block a permit for an upcoming small cell wireless installation by Verizon. During the meeting, Danville Mayor Robert Storer stated that the vote was an effort to stand up to the federal government and telecommunications companies, like Verizon.

The Danville Town Council’s decision to deny the land use-permit for the small cell opens the town to possible lawsuits from Verizon.

“We’ve made a lot of difficult decisions over the years, and this one is right up there in my top three. But that is exactly why somebody elects us to do the right things,” Mayor Robert Storer said during the council meeting. “We’ve lost local control and this says: ‘You know what? We are sick of this and we’re not going to just sit here and be bulled over.’ We say no; we play our cards out. We’ve been in lawsuits before.”

The installation of small cell sites is taking place around the nation as the U.S. government and telecommunications companies roll out 5th Generation—or 5G—cellular technology. The new technology is expected to herald the beginning of Smart Cities, where driverless cars, pollution sensors, cell phones, traffic lights, and thousands of other devices interact in what is known as “The Internet of Things”. However, there have been a number of health and privacy concerns raised by opponents of the rapidly advancing 5G technology expansion.

The controversial vote came after the Town Council had been inundated with complaints and concerns from Danville residents who worry the new small cell site and other 5G related infrastructure could have negative health effects. The installation of small cells and other 5G infrastructure is opposed by Danville Citizens for Responsible Growth (DCRG), a local group who has been putting pressure on the Town Council since at least October 2018.

That month the Danville Planning Commission approved a land-use permit for the small cell site owned by Verizon. On November 2, DCRG filed an appeal challenging the approval. The group has been battling Danville officials since and was successful in convincing most of the council to vote against the permit. However, despite many of Danville’s residents expressing concerns regarding health, the council voted against the permit because the chosen location was intrusive.

Danville SanRamon reports:

“The Danville The decision to deny the permit was based on the council majority claiming that the proposed location was not the least intrusive site possible, that better alternative locations may exist and that the applicant had not adequately demonstrated the proposed facility would meet federal radio frequency standards — all of which went against the recommendation of town staff.”

In fact, Danville city attorney Robert Ewing noted that the Federal Communication Commission heavily regulates the installation of wireless cell sites and in the process limits local government’s ability to enact their own regulations.

While potential health concerns are a huge concern, if that was the basis on which you were making a decision I would be fairly confident to tell you that you would lose, because that’s about as clear as the law can get,” Ewing said at the meeting. “As much as I understand the concern folks have over safety, what I can tell you is that if you make a finding based on potential health impacts of RF, then I will tell you that my opinion is you would lose.”

According to the FCC’s regulations, local governing bodies are not allowed to even consider health risks when making their decisions. This is because the federal law known as the Wireless Communications Act of 1996 prohibits local jurisdictions from considering perceived health effects when taking an action on a proposed facility. Instead, cities and towns can only regulate cell sites based on the aesthetics and placement of the devices. This problem was only made worse in September 2018, when the FCC passed a new rule which put the federal government in complete control of the 5G rollout.

This is why Danville Mayor Storer talks about losing local control. The federal government and their partners in Big Wireless have usurped local control of our communities. Danville Councilwoman Renee Morgan advised the people of Danville not to stop their efforts to expose this loss of power.

“What we need to do to make sure that we gain that local control. You cannot walk out of here and say we won by having this cell site moved somewhere else. The point is to go out there and talk to your state legislators, and make sure that they understand that we as the town of Danville, deserve to tell people where we want to put these things — not have them dictate it to us.”

Despite the difficulties in organizing to raise awareness about 5G, there are recent examples of resistance at the federal level. In early February, the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee held a hearing on the future of 5G wireless technology and its impact on the American people and economy. At the hearing, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) raised concerns with the lack of scientific research and data on the technology’s potential health risks.

On January 24, Frank Pallone, Chairman of the U.S. House Commerce Committee, accused the FCC of collusion with Big Wireless on the massive 5G rollout. Pallone sent a letter to the FCC asking for copies of communications between the FCC and the corporations involved in the current roll out of 5th Generation (5G) cellular technology. Pallone’s letter seems to indicate that the Commerce Committee had spoken with a whistleblower.

In early December 2018, Senator Richard Blumenthal and California Representative Anna Eshoo held a press conference asking the FCC to provide evidence that 5G technology is safe. “To ensure we communicate accurate information to our constituents we respectfully request you provide to our offices the 5G safety determination from FCC and relevant health agencies that you referred to during the field hearing,” Blumenthal wrote.

It’s clear there are many questions about 5G which are going unanswered. Help us get to the bottom of this important story by sharing this article. 

To learn more about this topic see the following interviews: 

Derrick Broze talks with Theodora Scarato, Executive Director of Environmental Health Trust (EHT), about the health concerns around cell phones, wireless devices, and 5G.

Derrick Broze talks with Matt Cagle, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, regarding the privacy concerns surrounding the roll out of 5G technology and the so-called Internet of Things.

About the Author

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of three books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 1Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion, Vol. 2 and Manifesto of the Free Humans. Derrick is available for interviews. Please contact Derrick@activistpost.com

This article (California Mayor Admits Local Government Has “Lost Control” of 5G Rollout) was originally featured at The Mind Unleashed and is reposted here with permission. 

Continue Reading

Alternative News

U.S. Meteorologists ‘Deeply Concerned’ Over 5G Roll-Out

Published

on

Photo Credit: Waking Times

Jordan Davidson, EcoWatch

U.S. weather forecasters are the latest group to sound the alarm that the race to introduce 5G technologies may have adverse consequences.

In a letter to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), U.S. meteorologists called the potential for 5G mobile technologies to disrupt communication between weather satellites “deeply concerning,” according to the BBC.

The letter was signed by the American Meteorological Society, the National Weather Association and the American Geophysical Union. They oppose a FCC proposal to share a radio spectrum band with mobile companies, arguing that sharing the radio band may lead to a delay in life-saving data, according to Newsweek.

“(Interference will) postpone dissemination of vital information to the public to aid and protect life, property, businesses, and government operations. The loss of seconds can mean the difference between safety and grave risk to life and property,” said John Porter, an executive at AccuWeather, in a separate letter to the FCC, as Newsweek reported.

Experts warned that sharing the 1675-1680MHz band could cause delays in public service alerts about severe weather like hurricanes and tornadoes. The letter by the U.S. meteorologists piggy backs on a letter sent to the FCC Chairman by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) asking him not to issue 5G licenses “until the FCC approves the passive band protection limits that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) determine are necessary to protect critical satellite‐based measurements of atmospheric water vapour needed to forecast the weather.”

Results of the study are expected in 2020.

Wyden and Cantwell said that the “ongoing sale of wireless airwaves could damage the effectiveness of US weather satellites and harm forecasts and predictions relied on to protect safety, property, and national security.”

They reprimanded the FCC for beginning the auction “over the objections of NASA, NOAA, and members of the American Meteorological Society (AMS). These entities all argued that out-of-band emissions from future commercial broadband transmissions in the 24GHz band would disrupt the ability to collect water-vapour data measured in a neighbouring frequency band (23.6 to 24GHZ) that meteorologists rely on to forecast the weather,” as Ars Technica reported.

The extent of the radio wave interference will depend on where new 5G networks are, said Prof. William Webb, independent consultant and author of the book The 5G Myth, as the BBC reported.

If it’s only deployed in city centres, it probably won’t cause interference,” Webb said to the BBC. “But if it’s used in large volumes near the meteorological sites then yes it could.

Prominent U.S. agencies are not the only ones asking for more time before 5G licenses are issued. The new mobile technologies have also faced resistance in Europe. In April, Brussels banned the implementation of 5G technologies due to concerns over radiation.

I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not,” said Céline Fremault , Brussels’ Environment minister, as the Brussels Times reported. “The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt,” she added.

Under the current radiation standards in Brussels, a pilot project is not possible. Fremault said she does not intend to make an exception for faster Internet speed.

However, the GSMA — an organization that represents mobile network operators — believes that 5G services and weather sensing services can co-exist, according to the BBC.

We cannot allow these scare tactics to prevent us from reaping the huge societal and economic benefits of 5G networks,” said Brett Tarnutzer, the trade body’s head of spectrum, as the BBC reported. “We urge everyone to simply look at the facts and not get drawn in by misleading rhetoric.”

If you enjoyed reading this article and want to see more like this one, we’d be humbled if you would help us spread the word and share it with your friends and family. Join us in our quest to promote free, useful information to all.

Continue Reading

Alternative News

Who Created Facebook? New Letter From Alleged Insider Claims Zuckerberg Is A Frontman For Military Intelligence

Published

on

Photo Credit: Market Wacth

Makia Freeman, The Freedom Articles

Many people have wondered about the true origins of the social media giant which has gone from a Harvard startup to the company with almost the most users in the world – around 2.38 billion as of the first quarter of 2019. This is an astonishing figure which is inching its way to 1/3 (one third) of the entire global population. Are we supposed to believe the “geek genius” cover story that is used so often to describe the origins of Big Tech / Silicon Valley companies – or is there something more to the story?

New Letter From Alleged Former Facebook Insider And Former Lover Of Zuckerberg

A few weeks ago on June 13th 2019, American Intelligence Media published a letter which was hand-delivered to a member of the Anonymous Patriot’s Conclave. They were able to quickly verify a lot of the information in the letter, which they are calling the Zuckerberg Dossier. Although they can’t say that everything in the letter is true, they can “state with absolute confidence that the source is real.” The letter makes many explosive claims as quoted below. I encourage you to read it for yourself. The main themes are that:

– Mark Zuckerberg did not create Facebook but was chosen as a front man to make the military surveillance social media network go public;

– Zuckerberg was involved in CIA mind control programs as a child;

– Zuckerberg has many MIC (Military Intelligence Complex) handlers behind him who are controlling him and telling him exactly what to do;

– Zuckerberg stole code by hacking into the email account of the son of Michael McKibben, owner of Leader Technologies and the real inventor of scalable social media. Michael had emailed his son Max the white papers written to describe the new invention;

– Zuckerberg is either unable or barely able to write code, so the idea that he wrote innovative and unique code for Facebook is a giant, absurd lie.

Here are some quotes from the letter:

“Mark was chosen as child for a CIA training program because his relatives were some of the people creating the program.

I am not making excuses for Mark, but his choices have not been his own. Yes, he has become an evil sociopath who once believed in his heart-of-heart that if he decided he wanted to be president, all he had to do is say he wanted the job and “Facebook” would deliver the election to him. This is the level of brain-washing Mark is at – he is not in contact with reality.”

“He became this way through the brain-washing he received in his High School years by a DARPA program called TIA that needed a “boy-genius” to be the front man. This scam would make Mark into a global model of the young, cool, irreverent computer geniuses that “rule the world” and lead everyone to a cyber-god of artificial intelligence. Mark was just an unwitting puppet …”

“Mark Greenberg (Zuckerberg) did not write one single line of programming source code for Facebook. Those are lies and propaganda generated by his government, military handlers. Everyone knows that the Winkelvoss twins (Aaron and Cameron) won a $65 million dollar lawsuit settlement against Mark because they knew that their little Harvard Connection (HC) piece was just adjunct code attached to the original stolen source code – which was given to Mark by Professor James Chandler and IBM.”

“My old buddy, Sean Parker, an early member of Facebook has “confessed all” to the media and specifically told the truth that Facebook was meant as a cyber-drug to create and control addicts – digital addicts. As Sean said, we knew from the beginning it was harming every user and that is why we never let our friends or our children use these systems – it harms them tremendously and was the original intent of the media. Mark and I were told by representatives of DARPA that that was the intent of Facebook from its inception.”

Former Executive Sean Parker Had Previously Confessed That FB Exploited Human Psychology

Sean Parker is a former Facebook executive who publicly admitted that when Facebook was designed, exploiting loopholes in human psychology was a goal. Specifically, he mentions they built in giving people a dopamine hit every now and again to get them addicted, as well as playing off the people’s insecurity and need for social validation. He said:

““I don’t know if I really understood the consequences of what I was saying, because (of) the unintended consequences of a network when it grows to a billion or 2 billion people and … it literally changes your relationship with society, with each other … It probably interferes with productivity in weird ways. God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains.”

“The thought process that went into building these applications, Facebook being the first of them, … was all about: ‘How do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible?’”

“And that means that we need to sort of give you a little dopamine hit every once in a while, because someone liked or commented on a photo or a post or whatever. And that’s going to get you to contribute more content, and that’s going to get you … more likes and comments.”

“It’s a social-validation feedback loop … exactly the kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology.”

“The inventors, creators — it’s me, it’s Mark [Zuckerberg], it’s Kevin Systrom on Instagram, it’s all of these people — understood this consciously. And we did it anyway.”

Sean Parker

Who Created Facebook? Remember Lifelog?

As I covered in a previous article Hollywood, MSM & Silicon Valley: All Strings Pulled By Same Master, Facebook just coincidentally happened to have a creation date (February 4th, 2004) identical to when the Pentagon discontinued its Lifelog project. LifeLog was a surveillance operation dreamt up by the ultra sinister DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency). Facebook is the ultimate tool for self-surveillance whereby a person will willingly give up their data and privacy without realizing what they are doing.

Final Thoughts: Who Created Facebook? Same Answer As Who Created Google, Youtube And The Rest Of Silicon Valley

It remains to be seen whether the information in this letter or Zuckerberg Dossier will be verified. In answering the riddle of who created Facebook, we certainly need to recognize that, whether it’s Google/Alphabet/YouTube or Facebook, these Big Tech behemoths spun off from military projects and military seed funding right from the start. Like Amazon with its giant $600 million CIA contract, Big Tech is joined at the hip with the MIC and does its bidding. Big Tech is now a critical and indispensable cog in the US national security apparatus. It’s unprecedented and privacy-destroying surveillance – but you get free email accounts and emoticon-posting capabilities, so as Mark himself would say, it’s all cool, right?

About the Author

Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here), writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance. Makia is on MindsSteemit and FB.

Sources embedded throughout article.

This article (Who Created Facebook? New Letter from Alleged Insider Claims Zuckerberg is a Frontman for Military Intelligence) was originally created and published by The Freedom Articles and is re-posted here with permission. 

Continue Reading

Our Facebook Page

Trending Now

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Censorship is hiding us from you.

Get breaking conscious news articles sent directly to your inbox!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap